People v. Harrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Harrison

46 A.D.2d 665, 359 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 A.D.2d 665 (People v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Harrison, 46 A.D.2d 665, 359 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court,- Kings County, rendered June 13, 1973, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Case remanded to the Criminal Term for a hearing in accordance with the views expressed herein. Appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Defendant moved to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that the plea was induced by the unkept promise of an Assistant District Attorney not to make a sentence recommendation. Defendant is entitled to a hearing to test this allegation. If proven, defendant should be resentenced by a different Judge, at which time no sentence recommendation should be made by the prosecutor [666]*666(People v. Gotti, 43 A D 2d 958). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court,- Kings County, rendered June 13, 1973, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Case remanded to the Criminal Term for a hearing in accordance with the views expressed herein. Appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Defendant moved to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that the plea was induced by the unkept promise of an Assistant District Attorney not to make a sentence recommendation. Defendant is entitled to a hearing to test this allegation. If proven, defendant should be resentenced by a different Judge, at which time no sentence recommendation should be made by the prosecutor [666]*666(People v. Gotti, 43 A D 2d 958). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 665, 359 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harrison-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack