People v. Harris

74 Misc. 2d 707, 345 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1809
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 19, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Absent proof that the defendant desk clerk was aware that the premises were to be used for purposes of prostitution, which proof was not herein adduced, the mere knowing rental of a room to parties known not to be married to each other does not constitute a violation of the Penal Law.

Accordingly, as recognized by the respondent, reversal is required.

The judgment of conviction should be reversed on the law and the facts, complaint dismissed, and fine remitted.

Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Fine and Frank, JJ.

Judgment of conviction reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 74 Misc. 2d 707, 345 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

74 Misc. 2d 707 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Behncke
141 Misc. 2d 630 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1988)