People v. Harris

2016 NY Slip Op 6743, 143 A.D.3d 518, 38 N.Y.S.3d 798
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 A.D.3d 761
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 13, 2016·No. 1884 3273/05·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Analisa Torres, J.), entered on or about May 11, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s argument that the court’s assessment of points under the risk factor for a prior violent felony was not supported by sufficient documentation is unpreserved and we decline to consider it in the interest of justice. In any event, we find that the case summary was reliable hearsay that constituted clear and convincing evidence to support this point assessment (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 572-573 [2009]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Feinman, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 2016 NY Slip Op 6743, 143 A.D.3d 518, 38 N.Y.S.3d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 6743 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)