People v. Harris

216 A.D.2d 679, 628 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 A.D.2d 148

Opinion

Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Sheridan, J.), rendered January 22, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts).

Defendant’s sole argument on appeal is that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.20). In such [680]*680cases no one factor is determinative and the court must take into consideration and balance all factors as set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442). The record supports County Court’s conclusion that the only delay chargeable to the People was the date between arrest and arraignment. The remainder of the 18-month delay was occasioned by motion practice, preliminary proceedings and a trial on other charges, calendar congestion, defendant’s request for new counsel and plea bargaining (see, People v Whelan, 198 AD2d 668, lv denied 83 NY2d 812). Accordingly, we affirm.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 216 A.D.2d 679, 628 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6382 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 679 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Taranovich
335 N.E.2d 303 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Claim of Abellon v. Nyack Hospital
634 N.E.2d 597 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Whelan
198 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)