People v. Harris
706 N.W.2d 729, 474 Mich. 951
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 681 N.W.2d 653 →
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Miguel HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2004 *730 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would remand this case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing regarding whether there was probable cause for defendant's arrest. As it is, the record does not reflect facts sufficient to constitute probable cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Harris, 706 N.W.2d 729, 474 Mich. 951 (Mich. 2005).
706 N.W.2d 729 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.