People v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

People v. Harris

88 P.2d 229, 31 Cal. App. 2d 508, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 666

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cal. App. 2d 129 →

California Court of Appeal·Decided March 16, 1939·No. Crim. No. 380·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts in this action were filed in the office of the clerk of this court on [509]*509February 15, 1939, and the case was regularly placed on the calendar for argument on March 14, 1939.

No briefs have been filed and no appearance has been made for the defendant. The people moved to affirm the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code. It is evident that the motion must be granted. (People v. Whelan, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 274 [56 Pac. (2d) 960] .)

Judgment affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, J.

The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts in this action were filed in the office of the clerk of this court on [509]*509February 15, 1939, and the case was regularly placed on the calendar for argument on March 14, 1939.

No briefs have been filed and no appearance has been made for the defendant. The people moved to affirm the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code. It is evident that the motion must be granted. (People v. Whelan, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 274 [56 Pac. (2d) 960] .)

Judgment affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

People v. Harris, 88 P.2d 229, 31 Cal. App. 2d 508, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 666 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

88 P.2d 229 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related