People v. Harrington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Harrington

724 N.E.2d 386, 262 A.D.2d 142, 691 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6709

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 724 N.E.2d 386 (People v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Harrington, 724 N.E.2d 386, 262 A.D.2d 142, 691 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered September 10, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of IV2 to 3 years and 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the sentencing court’s remarks recommending against defendant’s parole release constituted an enhancement of his promised sentence is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would reject it (see, People v Saldana, 221 AD2d 239, 240, lv denied 87 NY2d 1024). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Wallach, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered September 10, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of IV2 to 3 years and 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the sentencing court’s remarks recommending against defendant’s parole release constituted an enhancement of his promised sentence is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would reject it (see, People v Saldana, 221 AD2d 239, 240, lv denied 87 NY2d 1024). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Wallach, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 N.E.2d 386, 262 A.D.2d 142, 691 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harrington-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack