People v. Harper

11 A.D.3d 711, 783 N.Y.S.2d 291, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12501
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 25, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 A.D.3d 711 (People v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Harper, 11 A.D.3d 711, 783 N.Y.S.2d 291, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12501 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered September 11, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court’s Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 [1974]) constituted a provident exercise of discretion (see People v Hegdal, 266 AD2d 472 [1999]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Harper
32 A.D.3d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 711, 783 N.Y.S.2d 291, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harper-nyappdiv-2004.