People v. Harper

155 A.D.2d 881, 549 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14707
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harper. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 A.D.2d 933

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, after a jury trial held in absentia, of driving while intoxicated as a felony, arguing, pursuant to People v Parker (57 NY2d 136), that his failure to appear at trial was not voluntary, and that the court therefore erred in proceeding in his absence. Defense counsel failed to object to the trial in absentia (cf., People v Parker, supra, at 139). Furthermore, the record at sentencing establishes that defendant’s failure to appear was voluntary.

We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Orleans County Court, Miles, J. — felony driving while intoxicated.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harper, 155 A.D.2d 881, 549 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

155 A.D.2d 881 (People v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Parker
440 N.E.2d 1313 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)