People v. Harold

2024 NY Slip Op 06469
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 2024
Docket833 KA 21-01513
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 06469 (People v. Harold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Harold, 2024 NY Slip Op 06469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Harold (2024 NY Slip Op 06469)
People v Harold
2024 NY Slip Op 06469
Decided on December 20, 2024
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 20, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, BANNISTER, NOWAK, AND HANNAH, JJ.

833 KA 21-01513

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

DORIAN HAROLD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (AXELLE LECOMTE MATHEWSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. KEANE, ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Susan M. Eagan, J.), rendered September 21, 2021. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, former 130.50 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. As the People correctly concede, defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 564-566 [2019], cert denied — US —, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]) and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Albanese, 218 AD3d 1366, 1366-1367 [4th Dept 2023], lv denied 40 NY3d 995 [2023]). We nevertheless reject defendant's challenge to the severity of his 10-year term of postrelease supervision and conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: December 20, 2024

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 110.00
New York PEN § 110.00

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 06469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harold-nyappdiv-2024.