People v. Harmon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Harmon

139 A.D.2d 665, 526 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.2d 665 (People v. Harmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Harmon, 139 A.D.2d 665, 526 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a [666]*666judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), rendered October 12, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved his claim as to the sufficiency of his plea allocution for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Smith, 121 AD2d 410, lv denied 68 NY2d 817). In any event, our review of the record reveals that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily pleaded guilty (see, Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9), and that the defendant’s allocution established the requisite elements of the crime of robbery in the first degree. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a [666]*666judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), rendered October 12, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved his claim as to the sufficiency of his plea allocution for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Smith, 121 AD2d 410, lv denied 68 NY2d 817). In any event, our review of the record reveals that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily pleaded guilty (see, Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9), and that the defendant’s allocution established the requisite elements of the crime of robbery in the first degree. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.2d 665, 526 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harmon-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack