People v. Harmon

414 N.E.2d 393, 51 N.Y.2d 863, 433 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2710
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 1980·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The hearing court found that the arresting officers had probable cause to believe that a crime had been committed and to link defendant to its commission. This finding was affirmed at the Appellate Division, and we cannot say that it was erroneous as a matter of law.

Nor do we find merit to defendant’s other contention that his station house identification was so tainted as to require its suppression as well as suppression of any later in-court identification. The hearing court determined that defendant’s "constitutional and civil rights were not in any way violated”. This conclusion, similarly affirmed at the Appellate Division, was not erroneous as a matter of law.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

[865]*865Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harmon, 414 N.E.2d 393, 51 N.Y.2d 863, 433 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2710 (N.Y. 1980).

414 N.E.2d 393 (People v. Harmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
161 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)