People v. Harmon
This text of 232 N.W.2d 187 (People v. Harmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of prison escape. MCLA 750.193; MSA 28.390. The Court of Appeals reversed defendant’s conviction, and we affirm on the same basis as People v Luther, ante, 394 Mich 619; 232 NW2d 184 (1975).
In this case the defendant testified to a similar confrontation to the one noted in Luther. 1 We discuss only one factual variation; defendant did not leave the prison until approximately 24 hours after the confrontation. This does not suffice to remove the defense of duress from the consideration of the jury.
"[W]hat constitutes present, immediate and impending compulsion depends on the circumstances of each case.” 2
The trial court’s refusal to give an instruction on duress was reversibly erroneous.
The Court of Appeals is affirmed. Defendant’s cross-appeal is moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 N.W.2d 187, 394 Mich. 625, 1975 Mich. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harmon-mich-1975.