People v. Harmon

232 N.W.2d 187, 394 Mich. 625, 1975 Mich. LEXIS 263
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 20, 1975
Docket56016, (Calendar No. 9)
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 232 N.W.2d 187 (People v. Harmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Harmon, 232 N.W.2d 187, 394 Mich. 625, 1975 Mich. LEXIS 263 (Mich. 1975).

Opinion

*626 L. B. Lindemer, J.

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of prison escape. MCLA 750.193; MSA 28.390. The Court of Appeals reversed defendant’s conviction, and we affirm on the same basis as People v Luther, ante, 394 Mich 619; 232 NW2d 184 (1975).

In this case the defendant testified to a similar confrontation to the one noted in Luther. 1 We discuss only one factual variation; defendant did not leave the prison until approximately 24 hours after the confrontation. This does not suffice to remove the defense of duress from the consideration of the jury.

"[W]hat constitutes present, immediate and impending compulsion depends on the circumstances of each case.” 2

The trial court’s refusal to give an instruction on duress was reversibly erroneous.

The Court of Appeals is affirmed. Defendant’s cross-appeal is moot.

T. G. Kavanagh, C. J., and Williams, Levin, M. S. Coleman, and J. W. Fitzgerald, JJ., concurred with Lindemer, J. Swainson, J., took no part in the decision of this case.
1

The opinion of the Court of Appeals sets forth the facts in sufficient detail. People v Harmon, 53 Mich App 482, 484—485; 220 NW2d 212, 213-214 (1974).

2

People v Richter, 54 Mich App 598; 221 NW2d 429 (1974). (In that case the time lapse was three weeks.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People of Michigan v. Bruce Alan Weaver
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016
State v. Pacheco
26 P.3d 572 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2001)
State v. Turner
711 P.2d 353 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1985)
El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Morales Roque
113 P.R. Dec. 876 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1983)
State v. Watts
298 S.E.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
People v. Mendoza
310 N.W.2d 860 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Martin
298 N.W.2d 900 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1980)
State v. Baker
598 S.W.2d 540 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Stanley
401 A.2d 1166 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
State v. Reese
272 N.W.2d 863 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)
State v. Bolden
581 P.2d 1195 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1978)
People v. Maes
583 P.2d 942 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1978)
State v. Haddix
566 S.W.2d 266 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
Esquibel v. State
576 P.2d 1129 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1978)
State v. Whisman
575 P.2d 1005 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)
State v. Horn
566 P.2d 1378 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1977)
State v. Procter
367 N.E.2d 908 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 N.W.2d 187, 394 Mich. 625, 1975 Mich. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harmon-mich-1975.