People v. Harley

37 A.D.2d 742, 323 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3528
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 13, 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 A.D.2d 742 (People v. Harley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Harley, 37 A.D.2d 742, 323 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Hamilton County resentencing appellant pursuant to People v. Montgomery (24 N Y 2d 130) upon a March 5, 1965 conviction for burglary in the third degree. The County Court correctly held that the issue of appellant’s attempt to withdraw his plea of guilty was a matter to be decided upon appeal and could not be raised at the Montgomery hearing (People v. Bennett, 35 A D 2d 1000). We, however, find no merit in appellant’s contention as to this issue. In addition, the court correctly ruled here that appellant should not be permitted to challenge at the Montgomery resentencing the constitutionality of a prior felony conviction of grand larceny in the second degree (compare People v. Wilkins, 28 N Y 2d 213). Unlike in the Wilkins case, appellant was required at the time of his original sentencing in 1965 to be given a warning of his right to attack the constitutionality of the predicate felony (compare Penal Law, § 1943 prior to April 10, 1964 and as amd. by L. 1964, ch. 446; see, also, present Code Crim. Pro., § 470-a and new Criminal Procedure Law, § 400.20), was in [743]*743fact given such warning and waived any right to raise any constitutional issue. Accordingly, he is precluded from doing so here (People v. Bennett, supra). Moreover, we note that the instant appellant would not even have been resentenced at all under the subsequent decisions in People v. Saunders (28 N Y 2d 196); People v. Lynn (28 N Y 2d 196) and People v. Ali (35 A D 2d 435). Finally, County Court at the resentencing reduced the maximum length of appellant’s sentence by five years. While we cannot alter this decision, we find no basis in the record for any such reduction. Judgment affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Darry P.
96 Misc. 2d 12 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1978)
United States Ex Rel. Cooper v. Zelker
339 F. Supp. 410 (S.D. New York, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A.D.2d 742, 323 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harley-nyappdiv-1971.