People v. Harleston

2018 NY Slip Op 65
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harleston. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 A.D.3d 412
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 4, 2018·No. 5267 312/13·Published

Opinion

People v Harleston (2018 NY Slip Op 00065)
People v Harleston
2018 NY Slip Op 00065
Decided on January 4, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 4, 2018
Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Tom, Kahn, Kern, JJ.

5267 312/13

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Kyle Harleston, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alice Wiseman of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (James Burke, J.), rendered August 3, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 4, 2018

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harleston, 2018 NY Slip Op 65 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 65 (People v. Harleston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431