People v. Harkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Harkins

201 A.D.2d 766, 607 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 766 (People v. Harkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Harkins, 201 A.D.2d 766, 607 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered February 10, 1993, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant contends that the prison sentence he received for attempted robbery in the second degree upon being found guilty of violating the terms of his probation is harsh and excessive. We disagree. Defendant failed to report to his probation officer and consumed alcohol and drugs, all in violation of the conditions of his probation. He also failed to complete his drug treatment program by refusing to sign releases as required by the terms of his probation. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the sentence of 1% to 5 years imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered February 10, 1993, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant contends that the prison sentence he received for attempted robbery in the second degree upon being found guilty of violating the terms of his probation is harsh and excessive. We disagree. Defendant failed to report to his probation officer and consumed alcohol and drugs, all in violation of the conditions of his probation. He also failed to complete his drug treatment program by refusing to sign releases as required by the terms of his probation. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the sentence of 1% to 5 years imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 766, 607 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harkins-nyappdiv-1994.