People v. Hargrove

95 A.D.2d 864, 464 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18815
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1983·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Balbach, J.), rendered June 14, 1979, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of assault in the second degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing said count. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The crime of assault in the second degree of which defendant was convicted requires proof of a physical injury to the victim (Penal Law, § 120.05, subd 6). Specifically subdivision 6 of section 120.05 of the Penal Law provides: “§ 120.05. Assault in the second degree. A person is guilty of assault in the second degree when * * * 6. In the course of and in furtherance of the commission or attempted commission.of a felony * * * or of immediate flight therefrom, he, or another participant if there be any, causes physical injury to a person other than one of the participants”. The Penal Law defines “ ‘[pjhysical injury’ ” as “impairment of physical condition or substantial pain” (Penal Law, § 10.00, subd 9). At trial, no evidence of physical impairment was offered, and the issue of physical injury was submitted to the jury solely upon the basis of the complainant’s testimony that she suffered a very sore neck from the attack. Such “subjective testimony, without more”, was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim suffered the requisite physical injury within the meaning of subdivision 6 of section 120.05, and subdivision 9 of section 10.00 of the Penal Law (see People v Cicciari, 90 AD2d 853; Matter of Philip A., 49 NY2d 198; People v Reed, 83 AD2d 566). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hargrove, 95 A.D.2d 864, 464 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

95 A.D.2d 864 (People v. Hargrove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeannie B. v. Roger D.
33 A.D.3d 994 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Commonwealth v. Rowlands
22 Pa. D. & C.4th 86 (Centre County Court of Common Pleas, 1993)
People v. Brown
145 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Anderson
143 A.D.2d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Commonwealth v. Kirkwood
520 A.2d 451 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
People v. Farkas
116 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Samuels
107 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)