People v. Hardy

2025 NY Slip Op 06100
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 2025
DocketCR-24-0380
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 06100 (People v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hardy, 2025 NY Slip Op 06100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Hardy (2025 NY Slip Op 06100)

People v Hardy
2025 NY Slip Op 06100
Decided on November 6, 2025
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:November 6, 2025

CR-24-0380

[*1]The People of the State of New York Respondent,

v

Rahmel J. Hardy, Appellant.


Calendar Date:October 3, 2025
Before:Clark, J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ.

Thomas L. Pelych, Hornell, for appellant.

F. Paul Battisti, District Attorney, Binghamton (Mary E. Saitta of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Joseph Cawley, J.), rendered January 27, 2023, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a superior court information, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and agreed to waive his right to appeal. In accordance with the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant, as a second violent felony offender, to a prison term of five years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed is unduly harsh and severe given various alleged mitigating factors. Defendant's request that we reduce his sentence in the interest of justice is foreclosed, however, by his unchallenged waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Drennen, 236 AD3d 1245, 1247 [3d Dept 2025], lv denied 43 NY3d 1045 [2025]; People v Kozik, 235 AD3d 1065, 1066 [3d Dept 2025], lv denied 43 NY3d 964 [2025]; People v Brown, 197 AD3d 1440, 1440 [3d Dept 2021]).

Clark, J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brown
2021 NY Slip Op 05047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 06100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hardy-nyappdiv-2025.