People v. Hardy
49 A.D.3d 779, 852 N.Y.2d 848
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Since the defendant had already been released on parole in connection with his 1996 conviction when he moved for [780]*780resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643), he was no longer eligible for resentencing, and the court could therefore properly deny the motion without first holding a hearing (see People v McCurdy, 46 AD3d 843 [2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 1036 [2008]; People v Corley, 45 AD3d 857 [2007]). Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Miller, Carni and Eng, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hardy, 49 A.D.3d 779, 852 N.Y.2d 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 779 (People v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Rodriguez
61 A.D.3d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Mills
901 N.E.2d 196 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)