People v. Hardmon

45 A.D.3d 1394, 844 N.Y.S.2d 747
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a new sentence of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered April 24, 2006 imposed upon defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. Defendant was resentenced pursuant to the 2005 Drug Law Reform Act upon his 2004 conviction.

It is hereby ordered that the sentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: County Court granted the application of defendant for resentencing pursuant to the 2005 Drug Law Reform Act ([DLRA-2] L 2005, ch 643, § 1) upon his 2004 conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18 [former (1)]), and defendant now appeals from the new sentence. Defendant’s contentions are the same as those raised by the defendant in People v Williams (45 AD3d 1377 [2007]) and, for reasons stated in our decision in that case, we reverse the sentence and remit the matter to County Court to determine [1395]*1395defendant’s application in compliance with DLRA-2. Present— Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Smith, Fahey and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hardmon, 45 A.D.3d 1394, 844 N.Y.S.2d 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

45 A.D.3d 1394 (People v. Hardmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hardmon
66 A.D.3d 1521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)