People v. Harding

Supreme Court of Colorado

People v. Harding

2016 CO 30, 379 P.3d 277

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedMay 10, 2016

DocketSupreme Court Case No: 2013SC582

StatusPublished

This text of 2016 CO 30 (People v. Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Harding, 2016 CO 30, 379 P.3d 277 (Colo. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW

Upon consideration of the Record on Appeal, together with the Written and Oral Arguments of counsel,

Chief Justice Rice, Justice Coats, and Justice Hood are of the opinion that the judgment of the Colorado Court of Appeals, announced June 27, 2013, in 2010 CA 1584 should be affirmed, whereas Justice Eid, Justice Marquez, and Justice Boatright are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the Colorado Court of Appeals is [278]*278affirmed by operation of law. 'See C.A.R. 85(e).

JUSTICE GABRIEL does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW

Upon consideration of the Record on Appeal, together with the Written and Oral Arguments of counsel,

Chief Justice Rice, Justice Coats, and Justice Hood are of the opinion that the judgment of the Colorado Court of Appeals, announced June 27, 2013, in 2010 CA 1584 should be affirmed, whereas Justice Eid, Justice Marquez, and Justice Boatright are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the Colorado Court of Appeals is [278]*278affirmed by operation of law. 'See C.A.R. 85(e).

JUSTICE GABRIEL does not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 CO 30, 379 P.3d 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harding-colo-2016.