People v. Hardie

256 A.D.2d 419, 682 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13383

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered May 1, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The weight to be accorded to the evidence presented is primarily a question to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94; People v Hawkins, 248 AD2d 634). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Morris, 244 AD2d 361; People v Dominick, 243 AD2d 723; People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hardie, 256 A.D.2d 419, 682 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13383 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 419 (People v. Hardie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Gaimari
68 N.E. 112 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Garafolo
44 A.D.2d 86 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
People v. Dominick
243 A.D.2d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Morris
244 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Hawkins
248 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)