People v. Hanson
This text of 683 N.Y.S.2d 202 (People v. Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J.) rendered December 17, 1996, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and, sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a determinate term of 5 years, unanimously affirmed.
With defendant’s consent, the court properly conducted a combined suppression hearing and nonjury trial (People v Yousef, 236 AD2d 868, lv denied 90 NY2d 866). Counsel’s consent to the procedure employed by the court did not deprive him of effective assistance of counsel. On the existing record, [75]*75which defendant has not sought to expand by means of a CPL article 440 motion in order to explore counsel’s strategy (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709), we find that counsel pursued a strategy that was reasonable under the circumstances. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
683 N.Y.S.2d 202, 256 A.D.2d 74, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hanson-nyappdiv-1998.