People v. Hanson
This text of 25 A.D.2d 911 (People v. Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon reargument (23 A D 2d 706) we withheld determination pending further proceedings consistent with the Court of Appeals’ decision in People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72) and the County Court of Rensselaer County has now determined that the confession introduced at the trial was involuntary based upon the opinion evidence of the doctors originally called by the defense at the trial proper. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered. Judgment of conviction reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 911, 270 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hanson-nyappdiv-1966.