People v. Hansley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hansley

88 A.D.2d 622, 450 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 88 A.D.2d 622 (People v. Hansley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hansley, 88 A.D.2d 622, 450 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), rendered November 12, 1976, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to Criminal Term for resentencing in accordance herewith. Although defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree upon four separate counts, the sentencing court erred in failing to distinguish between the counts and to pronounce sentence on each count (see CPL 380.20; People v Williams, 67 AD2d 265, affd 50 NY2d 996). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), rendered November 12, 1976, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to Criminal Term for resentencing in accordance herewith. Although defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree upon four separate counts, the sentencing court erred in failing to distinguish between the counts and to pronounce sentence on each count (see CPL 380.20; People v Williams, 67 AD2d 265, affd 50 NY2d 996). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 622, 450 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hansley-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack