People v. Hansen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hansen

45 A.D.2d 745, 357 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4718

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.2d 745 (People v. Hansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hansen, 45 A.D.2d 745, 357 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, (1) from so much of a sentence of the County Court, Rockland Comity, imposed February 13, 1973, as committed him to a reformatory term upon a conviction of burglary in the third degree, on a jury verdict, and (2) from another sentence of the same court, imposed May 15, 1973, committing him to another reformatory term, to run- concurrently with the above-mentioned commitment, upon a conviction of escape in the second degree, on a guilty plea. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing them to the time served. As so modified, sentences affirmed. In our opinion, the sentences were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, (1) from so much of a sentence of the County Court, Rockland Comity, imposed February 13, 1973, as committed him to a reformatory term upon a conviction of burglary in the third degree, on a jury verdict, and (2) from another sentence of the same court, imposed May 15, 1973, committing him to another reformatory term, to run- concurrently with the above-mentioned commitment, upon a conviction of escape in the second degree, on a guilty plea. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing them to the time served. As so modified, sentences affirmed. In our opinion, the sentences were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 745, 357 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hansen-nyappdiv-1974.