People v. Hann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hann

238 A.D.2d 441, 657 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3792

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 1997·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (D. Goldstein, J.), imposed July 12, 1995, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal should not be enforced (see, People v Velez, 216 AD2d 339; People v Prescott, 196 AD2d 599). Upon review of the defendant’s contention, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Bailey, 215 AD2d 769; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (D. Goldstein, J.), imposed July 12, 1995, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal should not be enforced (see, People v Velez, 216 AD2d 339; People v Prescott, 196 AD2d 599). Upon review of the defendant’s contention, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Bailey, 215 AD2d 769; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

People v. Hann, 238 A.D.2d 441, 657 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

238 A.D.2d 441 (People v. Hann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related