People v. Hanley

286 N.E.2d 734, 30 N.Y.2d 863, 335 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1223
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hanley. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 N.Y.2d 648
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 1972·Published

Opinions

Memorandum.

The order of County Court of Herkimer County, reversing the judgment of the Court of Special Sessions convicting defendant of violation of section 1102 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, should be affirmed (People v. Fidler, 280 App. Div. 698). The order failed to make recital of grounds for reversal as set forth in sections 543 (subd. 3) and 543-a of the former Code of Criminal Procedure, applicable to this County Court appeal (CPL 1.10, subd. 2, par. [b]). This question was not raised or argued by the People as appellant and the court deems it unnecessary to remand for formal implementation of the County Court’s order. But these directory provisions should be followed when there is reversal or modification in intermediate criminal appeals. The new Criminal Procedure Law (CPL 470.25, subd. 2, par. [b]) is more explicit in its directory provisions in this respect than the former code.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hanley, 286 N.E.2d 734, 30 N.Y.2d 863, 335 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1223 (N.Y. 1972).

286 N.E.2d 734 (People v. Hanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fidler
280 A.D. 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)