People v. Haney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Haney

137 A.D.3d 453, 25 N.Y.S.3d 876

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 2016·No. 393B 3107/13 263/14 60/14 393A 393·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from *454 judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J.), rendered July 17, 2014, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from *454 judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J.), rendered July 17, 2014, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.

People v. Haney, 137 A.D.3d 453, 25 N.Y.S.3d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

137 A.D.3d 453 (People v. Haney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.