People v. Handley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Handley

46 A.D.3d 1378, 847 N.Y.S.2d 881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.3d 1378 (People v. Handley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Handley, 46 A.D.3d 1378, 847 N.Y.S.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P. Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered April 26, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that his plea is invalid pursuant to CPL 220.10 (5) (d) (i), inasmuch as he pleaded guilty to attempted burglary in the second degree, a class D violent felony offense (see § 70.02 [1] [c]), as a lesser included offense of burglary in the first degree, a class B violent felony offense (see § 70.02 [1] [a]). Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, and thus his contention is not preserved for our review (see People v Van Dyne, 12 AD3d 120, 124 [2004], as amended by 2005 NY Slip Op 00917[U] [2005]; People v Vasquez, 267 AD2d 118 [1999], lv denied 95 NY2d 805 [2000]). In any event, CPL 220.10 (5) (d) (i) does not preclude defendant’s plea to a class D violent felony offense because the class B violent felony offense charged in the indictment is not an armed felony offense (see Penal Law § 140.30 [2]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Centra and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P. Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered April 26, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that his plea is invalid pursuant to CPL 220.10 (5) (d) (i), inasmuch as he pleaded guilty to attempted burglary in the second degree, a class D violent felony offense (see § 70.02 [1] [c]), as a lesser included offense of burglary in the first degree, a class B violent felony offense (see § 70.02 [1] [a]). Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, and thus his contention is not preserved for our review (see People v Van Dyne, 12 AD3d 120, 124 [2004], as amended by 2005 NY Slip Op 00917[U] [2005]; People v Vasquez, 267 AD2d 118 [1999], lv denied 95 NY2d 805 [2000]). In any event, CPL 220.10 (5) (d) (i) does not preclude defendant’s plea to a class D violent felony offense because the class B violent felony offense charged in the indictment is not an armed felony offense (see Penal Law § 140.30 [2]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Centra and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.3d 1378, 847 N.Y.S.2d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-handley-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack