People v. Hancock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hancock

126 A.D.2d 745, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.2d 745 (People v. Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hancock, 126 A.D.2d 745, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murray, J.), rendered July 27, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (15 counts), robbery in the second degree (five counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), criminal use of a firearm (four counts), grand larceny in the second degree, and grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murray, J.), rendered July 27, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (15 counts), robbery in the second degree (five counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), criminal use of a firearm (four counts), grand larceny in the second degree, and grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 745, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hancock-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack