People v. Hancock

California Supreme Court

People v. Hancock

48 Cal. 631

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

DocketNo. 4,034

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 Cal. 631 (People v. Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hancock, 48 Cal. 631 (Cal. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The defendants answered and proved that a tract of land containing nearly one third of the larger tract described in the assessment had been by them sold and conveyed by deed, duly recorded, two years before the assessment was made. The Court below found that the assessment contained no data from whjfeh could be estimated what sum should be paid by the defendants, and properly gave judgment for the defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The defendants answered and proved that a tract of land containing nearly one third of the larger tract described in the assessment had been by them sold and conveyed by deed, duly recorded, two years before the assessment was made. The Court below found that the assessment contained no data from whjfeh could be estimated what sum should be paid by the defendants, and properly gave judgment for the defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 Cal. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hancock-cal-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack