People v. Hammonds
This text of 58 A.D.3d 706 (People v. Hammonds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), entered March 25, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court’s determination to designate him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The determination was based on the facts and admissions contained in the presen-tence investigation report, the case summary and the risk as[707]*707sessment instrument of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, and the victim’s sworn statement (see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Arnold, 35 AD3d 827 [2006]; People v Murphy, 33 AD3d 778, 779 [2006]; People v Thompson, 31 AD3d 409 [2006]; People v Grimmett, 29 AD3d 766, 767 [2006]; People v Hines, 24 AD3d 524, 525 [2005]; People v Davis, 21 AD3d 590, 592 [2005]). Prudenti, RJ., Spolzino, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 A.D.3d 706, 870 N.Y.S.2d 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hammonds-nyappdiv-2009.