People v. Hammonds

58 A.D.3d 706, 870 N.Y.S.2d 805
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hammonds. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 A.D.3d 441

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), entered March 25, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court’s determination to designate him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The determination was based on the facts and admissions contained in the presen-tence investigation report, the case summary and the risk as[707]*707sessment instrument of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, and the victim’s sworn statement (see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Arnold, 35 AD3d 827 [2006]; People v Murphy, 33 AD3d 778, 779 [2006]; People v Thompson, 31 AD3d 409 [2006]; People v Grimmett, 29 AD3d 766, 767 [2006]; People v Hines, 24 AD3d 524, 525 [2005]; People v Davis, 21 AD3d 590, 592 [2005]). Prudenti, RJ., Spolzino, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hammonds, 58 A.D.3d 706, 870 N.Y.S.2d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

58 A.D.3d 706 (People v. Hammonds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Davis
21 A.D.3d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Hines
24 A.D.3d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Grimmett
29 A.D.3d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Thompson
31 A.D.3d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Murphy
33 A.D.3d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Arnold
35 A.D.3d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)