People v. Hammonds

244 A.D.2d 424, 665 N.Y.S.2d 552, 664 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11243
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hammonds. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D.2d 166

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Tomlinson, J.), rendered April 15, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit or have been waived. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hammonds, 244 A.D.2d 424, 665 N.Y.S.2d 552, 664 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 424 (People v. Hammonds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)