People v. Hammock

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Hammock

932 N.W.2d 788

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 20, 2019

DocketSC: 158819; COA: 343893

StatusPublished

This text of 932 N.W.2d 788 (People v. Hammock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hammock, 932 N.W.2d 788 (Mich. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County *789Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. In the answer, the prosecuting attorney shall address: (1) whether the trial court failed to "carefully consider the newly discovered evidence in light of the evidence presented at trial," People v. Grissom , 492 Mich. 296, 321, 821 N.W.2d 50 (2012) ; (2) "whether a reasonable juror could find the testimony credible on retrial," People v. Johnson , 502 Mich. 541, 567, 918 N.W.2d 676 (2018) ; and (3) whether the newly discovered evidence makes a different result probable on retrial. Id. at 566, 571-572, 918 N.W.2d 676. The motion for bond pending appeal and the motion for peremptory reversal are DENIED.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County *789Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. In the answer, the prosecuting attorney shall address: (1) whether the trial court failed to "carefully consider the newly discovered evidence in light of the evidence presented at trial," People v. Grissom , 492 Mich. 296, 321, 821 N.W.2d 50 (2012) ; (2) "whether a reasonable juror could find the testimony credible on retrial," People v. Johnson , 502 Mich. 541, 567, 918 N.W.2d 676 (2018) ; and (3) whether the newly discovered evidence makes a different result probable on retrial. Id. at 566, 571-572, 918 N.W.2d 676. The motion for bond pending appeal and the motion for peremptory reversal are DENIED.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

932 N.W.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hammock-mich-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack