People v. Hamilton

2017 NY Slip Op 5461, 152 A.D.3d 544, 54 N.Y.S.3d 874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hamilton. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 A.D.3d 1243
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 2017·No. 2015-07178·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), rendered October 15, 2013, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and upon an independent review of the *545 record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]).

Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hamilton, 2017 NY Slip Op 5461, 152 A.D.3d 544, 54 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 5461 (People v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)