People v. Hamilton

234 A.D.2d 974, 652 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13724
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in denying defendant’s request to charge burglary in the third degree as a lesser included offense of burglary in the second degree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to defendant, we conclude that there is no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater by entering a building that was not a dwelling (see, CPL 300.50 [1]; People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61, 63). We further conclude that the verdict is not contrary to the weight of evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495) and that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hamilton, 234 A.D.2d 974, 652 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 974 (People v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Snow
298 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Banks
294 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)