People v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hamilton

107 A.D.2d 760, 484 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42674

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A.D.2d 760 (People v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hamilton, 107 A.D.2d 760, 484 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeals by defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kay, J.), rendered October 5, 1981, convicting him (on indictment No. 142/81) of robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence; and (2) a judgment of the same court, also rendered October 5, 1981, convicting him (on indictment No. 2275/81) of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgments affirmed.

[761]*761The jury properly found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree under indictment No. 142/81.

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals by defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kay, J.), rendered October 5, 1981, convicting him (on indictment No. 142/81) of robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence; and (2) a judgment of the same court, also rendered October 5, 1981, convicting him (on indictment No. 2275/81) of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgments affirmed.

[761]*761The jury properly found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree under indictment No. 142/81.

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A.D.2d 760, 484 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hamilton-nyappdiv-1985.