People v. Hamil
110 A.D.2d 659, 487 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48555
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[660]*660The sentence imposed on defendant as a second felony offender is the minimum legal sentence for the crime to which he pleaded guilty (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3] [b]; [4] [b]; § 140.30). Although it was not the sentence originally agreed to, defendant was afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea prior to imposition of sentence and, after consultation with counsel, declined to do so. We find no reason to set aside that sentence. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hamil, 110 A.D.2d 659, 487 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 659 (People v. Hamil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Pistone
117 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)