People v. Hamil
This text of 110 A.D.2d 659 (People v. Hamil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[660]*660The sentence imposed on defendant as a second felony offender is the minimum legal sentence for the crime to which he pleaded guilty (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3] [b]; [4] [b]; § 140.30). Although it was not the sentence originally agreed to, defendant was afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea prior to imposition of sentence and, after consultation with counsel, declined to do so. We find no reason to set aside that sentence. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.D.2d 659, 487 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hamil-nyappdiv-1985.