People v. Hames

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hames

261 A.D.2d 193, 689 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5251

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 A.D.2d 193 (People v. Hames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hames, 261 A.D.2d 193, 689 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered December 20, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive terms of 2xk to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of the course of conduct of defendant and the other participants in the transactions, and, in particular, the timing of the events in question (see, People v Whatley, 69 NY2d 784, 785), permitted the jury to reasonably infer that defendant was part of a well-orchestrated continuing scheme to sell large quantities of PCP to the undercover officer. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered December 20, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive terms of 2xk to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of the course of conduct of defendant and the other participants in the transactions, and, in particular, the timing of the events in question (see, People v Whatley, 69 NY2d 784, 785), permitted the jury to reasonably infer that defendant was part of a well-orchestrated continuing scheme to sell large quantities of PCP to the undercover officer. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D.2d 193, 689 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hames-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack