People v. Halwig

288 A.D.2d 949, 732 N.Y.S.2d 208, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10682
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 9, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 288 A.D.2d 949 (People v. Halwig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Halwig, 288 A.D.2d 949, 732 N.Y.S.2d 208, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]), sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [1]), and sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [1]). We conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the forcible compulsion element of each of those crimes and that the verdict convicting defendant of those crimes is not against the weight of the evidence (see, Penal Law § 130.00 [8]; People v Thompson, 72 NY2d 410, 415-416, rearg denied 73 NY2d 870; People v Stephens, 176 AD2d 1189, Iv denied 79 NY2d 832; see generally, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The credibility of the victim and the weight to be accorded her testimony were matters for the jury (see, People v Gruttola, 43 NY2d 116, 122). The testimony of the victim, although inconsistent in some respects, was not incredible as a matter of law (see, People v Jordan, 239 AD2d 947, Iv denied 90 NY2d 940; People v Everett, 234 AD2d 915). There is no basis in this record to disturb the jury’s verdict (see, People v [950]*950Bleakley, supra, at 495; People v Jordan, supra). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Dwyer, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hudson
2018 NY Slip Op 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
HAZZARD, KURT J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Hazzard
129 A.D.3d 1598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
SMALLS, JR., ERVIN, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Smalls
100 A.D.3d 1428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
MCCRAY, WENFORD N., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. McCray
96 A.D.3d 1480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Robinson
41 A.D.3d 1183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Coffin
38 A.D.3d 1316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Delatorres
34 A.D.3d 1343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Gray
15 A.D.3d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 949, 732 N.Y.S.2d 208, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-halwig-nyappdiv-2001.