People v. Halter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Halter

66 A.D.3d 1442, 885 N.Y.S.2d 705

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 A.D.3d 1442 (People v. Halter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Halter, 66 A.D.3d 1442, 885 N.Y.S.2d 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered August 7, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [3]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention concerning the duration of the order of protection (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 315-317 [2004]) and, in any event, that contention is without merit. County Court properly specified an expiration date in the order of protection that was no more than eight years after the expiration of the term of the determinate sentence imposed, in accordance with CPL 530.12 (former [5]), the version of the statute in effect when the judgment was rendered on August 7, 2007 (see generally People v Vega, 49 AD3d 1185 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 965 [2008]; People v Stone, 49 AD3d 1314 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 965 [2008]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, EJ, Smith, Garni, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered August 7, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [3]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention concerning the duration of the order of protection (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 315-317 [2004]) and, in any event, that contention is without merit. County Court properly specified an expiration date in the order of protection that was no more than eight years after the expiration of the term of the determinate sentence imposed, in accordance with CPL 530.12 (former [5]), the version of the statute in effect when the judgment was rendered on August 7, 2007 (see generally People v Vega, 49 AD3d 1185 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 965 [2008]; People v Stone, 49 AD3d 1314 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 965 [2008]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, EJ, Smith, Garni, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.3d 1442, 885 N.Y.S.2d 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-halter-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack