People v. Hallett
This text of 4 Cow. 67 (People v. Hallett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No nominal damages are given in a judgment by default in debt.
Rule accordingly.
And so are the entries in Lil. Ent. 473, 483, 503. Tidd. Pr. Forms, 169-70, on mutuutus. So of debt on bond. (Id.) So in 5 Wentw. 165-6, 414; and 10 id. 427-8, 453 ; and 7 id, 402.
Nominal or other damages are given by verdict in debt. (Lil, Ent. 257, 379. Tidd. Pr. Forms, 186-7.
And hence, Clapp v. Reynolds, (2 Johns. Cas. 409,) was probably the case of a verdict; and what is said by Buller, J. in Lord Lonsdale v. Church, (2 T. R. 398,) and by Lord Kenyon, Ch. J. in Wilde v. Clarkson, (6 T. R. 304,) of nominal damages, must also be understood in reference to a recovery by verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Cow. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hallett-nysupct-1825.