People v. Hall-Wilson
This text of 129 A.D.2d 960 (People v. Hall-Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[961]*961tion of her ability to pay the restitution is unsupported by the record. We disagree on both counts.
At the hearing below, defendant did not contest the amount of damages caused by her criminal act, nor does she on appeal. Moreover, the manner in which the restitution is to be paid was suggested by defendant’s counsel and conceded to be within her means.
The court’s determination that defendant had the ability to pay the restitution was amply supported by evidence in the record. Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D.2d 960, 514 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hall-wilson-nyappdiv-1987.