People v. Hall-Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hall-Wilson

129 A.D.2d 960, 514 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45614

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hall-Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 A.D.2d 999 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 1987·Published

Opinion

[961]*961tion of her ability to pay the restitution is unsupported by the record. We disagree on both counts.

At the hearing below, defendant did not contest the amount of damages caused by her criminal act, nor does she on appeal. Moreover, the manner in which the restitution is to be paid was suggested by defendant’s counsel and conceded to be within her means.

The court’s determination that defendant had the ability to pay the restitution was amply supported by evidence in the record. Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[961]*961tion of her ability to pay the restitution is unsupported by the record. We disagree on both counts.

At the hearing below, defendant did not contest the amount of damages caused by her criminal act, nor does she on appeal. Moreover, the manner in which the restitution is to be paid was suggested by defendant’s counsel and conceded to be within her means.

The court’s determination that defendant had the ability to pay the restitution was amply supported by evidence in the record. Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr and Pine, JJ.

People v. Hall-Wilson, 129 A.D.2d 960, 514 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

129 A.D.2d 960 (People v. Hall-Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.