People v. Hall

89 Misc. 2d 836, 393 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1951
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 7, 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. Judgments of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial ordered.

In light of the concession of the People, and after reviewing the record on appeal, we are of the opinion that the absence of judicial supervision in unsealing the tapes of the recorded conversations before the Grand Jury rendered said tapes inadmissible in evidence (People v Sher, 38 NY2d 600, 603-605). We also find that the procedure then in use to preserve [837] the sanctity and integrity of the tapes was grossly inadequate in that no log was kept as to the movement of the tapes and that the tapes themselves were not sealed in such a way so that a breaking of the seal could be detected.

Concur — Farley, P.J., Pittoni and Silberman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hall, 89 Misc. 2d 836, 393 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1951 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1977).

89 Misc. 2d 836 (People v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re General American Communications Corp.
63 B.R. 534 (S.D. New York, 1986)