People v. Hall

142 A.D.3d 1104, 37 N.Y.S.3d 713
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hall. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 A.D.3d 1349
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 21, 2016·No. 2015-01998·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Freehill, J.), imposed February 6, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]; People v Davis, 141 AD3d 675 [2016]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hall, 142 A.D.3d 1104, 37 N.Y.S.3d 713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 1104 (People v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Davis
141 A.D.3d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)