People v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hall

286 A.D.2d 270, 730 N.Y.S.2d 424, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8140

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 23, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D.2d 270 (People v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hall, 286 A.D.2d 270, 730 N.Y.S.2d 424, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme [271]*271Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered July 19, 1999, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given the backgrounds of the People’s witnesses and the minor inconsistencies in their testimony, were properly considered by the court and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme [271]*271Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered July 19, 1999, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given the backgrounds of the People’s witnesses and the minor inconsistencies in their testimony, were properly considered by the court and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 270, 730 N.Y.S.2d 424, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hall-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack