People v. Hall
This text of 551 N.E.2d 1237 (People v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions, pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order af *828 firmed. The finding by the courts below that the.initial approach of defendant by the police was justified presents a mixed question of law and fact which is beyond the review powers of this court because the evidence at the hearing was legally sufficient to support the determination made by the lower courts (People v Harrison, 57 NY2d 470, 477; People v Wharton, 46 NY2d 924, 925). We have considered defendant’s additional arguments and consider them to be without merit or not preserved.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 N.E.2d 1237, 75 N.Y.2d 826, 552 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hall-ny-1990.