People v. Hale

880 N.W.2d 596, 499 Mich. 974
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 8, 2016·No. No. 153332; Court of Appeals No. 322144·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hale, 880 N.W.2d 596, 499 Mich. 974 (Mich. 2016).

880 N.W.2d 596 (People v. Hale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People of Michigan v. Senica Demice Hale
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018