People v. Hahn

271 N.E.2d 379, 132 Ill. App. 2d 1093, 1971 Ill. App. LEXIS 1633
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJuly 13, 1971
DocketNo. 11313
StatusPublished

This text of 271 N.E.2d 379 (People v. Hahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hahn, 271 N.E.2d 379, 132 Ill. App. 2d 1093, 1971 Ill. App. LEXIS 1633 (Ill. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Mr. JUSTICE TRAPP

delivered the opinion of the court:

Upon defendants’ prior appeal the judgment of conviction of the offense of escape was affirmed but the sentence was vacated and the cause was remanded with directions for reimposition of sentence. People v. Hahn, 114 Ill.App.2d 262, 252 N.E.2d 373.

Upon remand the sentence imposed was for a minimum of three years three months, and a maximum of eight years three months, to run concurrently with any unexpired Federal sentence being served by the defendant. Such sentence, in effect, provided credit upon this sentence for defendant’s sentence concurrently served in another State.

Counsel appointed upon this appeal have filed a motion to withdraw as counsel providing, and serving upon defendant, a brief as provided in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.

Defendant has filed asserted additional points upon appeal in pro se response to the order of this Court. His unsworn statements contending that he was compelled to waive evidence in mitigation are contradicted by his sworn testimony at the hearing upon reimposition of sentence. His right to appeal has not been denied.

The record shows that upon a hearing at the reimposition of sentence, defendant was represented by two appointed counsel and that defendant expressly waived any further evidence in mitigation. In response to the detailed questions of the court, defendant advised that no representations had been made to him concerning the sentence to be imposed by the court.

The trial court has fully complied with the mandate of this Court and imposed a lawful sentence. The motion of the Illinois Defender Project to withdraw as appointed counsel is granted.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

SMITH, P. J., and CRAVEN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Hahn
252 N.E.2d 373 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 N.E.2d 379, 132 Ill. App. 2d 1093, 1971 Ill. App. LEXIS 1633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hahn-illappct-1971.